Pairwise Influences and Bargaining Among the Many
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we build a model to analyze distributional conflict when the utility of each agent is heterogeneously influenced by other agents’ utility. There are two dimensions of heterogeneity: who influences whom, and the strength of any such pairwise dependent influence. The pattern of bilateral influences takes the form of a weighted and directed network. Direct influences spread their effects through chains of connected agents in this network. We characterize the Nash bargaining solution and analyze how pairwise influences, and the indirect effects they generate, are internalized in shares and utilities obtained. The analysis relies on network centrality indexes that measure each agent’s prominence due to his position in the influences structure. Our results have implications for the study of urban crime, government spending, and bargaining with social preferences.
منابع مشابه
Measuring the efficiency of Iranian electricity distribution companies, a combined approach to bargaining game with DEA
Many models have been proposed for measuring performance of business agencies up to now. The goal of this research is providing a new approach for evaluation and measurement of efficiencies of national power distribution companies. This approach is provided as a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Game Theory for evaluation of decision-making units by a large scale of actions. I...
متن کاملStrategic formation of homogeneous bargaining networks
We analyze a model of strategic network formation prior to a Manea (2011) bargaining game: ex-ante homogeneous players form costly undirected links anticipating expected equilibrium payoffs from the subsequent network bargaining. Assuming patient players, we provide a complete characterization of non-singularly pairwise (Nash) stable networks: specific disjoint unions of separated pairs, odd ci...
متن کاملMeasuring the efficiency of Iranian electricity distribution companies, a combined approach to bargaining game with DEA
Many models have been proposed for measuring performance of business agencies up to now. The goal of this research is providing a new approach for evaluation and measurement of efficiencies of national power distribution companies. This approach is provided as a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Game Theory for evaluation of decision-making units by a large scale of actions. I...
متن کاملDoes Scale of Public Hospitals Affect Bargaining Power? Evidence From Japan
Background Many of public hospitals in Japan have had a deficit for a long time. Japanese local governments have been encouraging public hospitals to use group purchasing of drugs to benefit from the economies of scale, and increase their bargaining power for obtaining discounts in drug purchasing, thus improving their financial situation. In this study, we empirically investigate whether or no...
متن کاملBargaining dynamics in exchange networks
We consider a one-sided assignment market or exchange network with transferable utility and propose a model for the dynamics of bargaining in such a market. Our dynamical model is local, involving iterative updates of ‘offers’ based on estimated best alternative matches, in the spirit of pairwise Nash bargaining. We establish that when a balanced outcome (a generalization of the pairwise Nash b...
متن کامل